Osage Roost

General Forum => General Discussion => Topic started by: 3CB on January 09, 2012, 09:35:56 AM

Title: BAMA
Post by: 3CB on January 09, 2012, 09:35:56 AM
ROLL TIDE
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: amims5 on January 09, 2012, 09:52:56 AM
Roll Tide Roll!!!
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: MKW on January 09, 2012, 11:28:13 AM
BAMA should win...well, unless LSU beats them, AGAIN!

 ROTFLMBO ROTFLMBO ROTFLMBO

Mike
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: West Augusta on January 09, 2012, 11:34:51 AM
Geaux Tiggers.  ROTFLMBO

(http://i42.tinypic.com/14093cn.gif)
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: 3CB on January 09, 2012, 12:14:21 PM
Either way, SEC rules the rest drool............
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: West Augusta on January 09, 2012, 12:18:16 PM
Drool?  I think that's what Clemson was doing the other night.  *lol*
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: BKA on January 09, 2012, 05:44:21 PM
No Steve, just looked like Drool I think that was Tears. *cry*
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: 3CB on January 09, 2012, 05:46:59 PM
CLEMPSON aint in the SEC!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: BKA on January 09, 2012, 05:59:23 PM
Your right, We wandered off track  *lol*
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: JOBUGG on January 09, 2012, 09:51:22 PM
BAMA beat down! I thought this was going to be a game? Hopefully LSU can score something.......
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: amims5 on January 09, 2012, 10:24:19 PM
Thus is no different than the first game. Bans physically whipped LSU in both meetings, this time Bama caught the breaks and the better team wins.
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: wiltznucs on January 09, 2012, 10:36:26 PM
Congrats to Bama, you outplayed LSU top to bottom. 

On the bright side, I'll never have to watch Jordan Jefferson in an LSU uniform again. *cheers*
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: mikey715 on January 09, 2012, 10:38:43 PM
Bama showed they were #1!  Congrats! *up*
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: ncturkey on January 09, 2012, 10:57:01 PM
Bama all the way. Roll Tide
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: West Augusta on January 10, 2012, 06:32:50 AM
Congrats Bama
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: B-Ready on January 10, 2012, 07:28:49 AM
Congrats To Bama and the SEC!!
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: misfire on January 10, 2012, 07:56:36 AM
I do believe that in Heaven, Mike Mimms is smiling largely
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: MadYelper on January 10, 2012, 04:46:11 PM
Congrats to Nick, his staff, the players, all students past & present, and Bama fans everywhere!  *cheers*
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: ronmexico on January 10, 2012, 06:38:49 PM
After last nights performance, we won't have to hear those lsu fans crying about deserving a split title.  *aah*
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: wiltznucs on January 10, 2012, 07:16:59 PM
After last nights performance, we won't have to hear those lsu fans crying about deserving a split title.  *aah*

I know, they'll simply have to savor stomping another mud hole in UGA, having beat the National Champ at home, beating the PAC-12 Champ, the Big East Champ, ands winning the SEC title.  While returning 18 starters next year.. Tragic!

Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: ronmexico on January 10, 2012, 07:26:33 PM
After last nights performance, we won't have to hear those lsu fans crying about deserving a split title.  *aah*

I know, they'll simply have to savor stomping another mud hole in UGA, having beat the National Champ at home, beating the PAC-12 Champ, the Big East Champ, ands winning the SEC title.  While returning 18 starters next year.. Tragic!

Well, most lsu fans won't be.  And where did I say anything about the Cajuns being ready to jump off the ledge?  All I said is lsu will have zero case for a split.
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: wiltznucs on January 10, 2012, 07:30:08 PM
The final poll results were available at 6 am this morning.  No LSU fan would ask nor want a split title after What happened in the 03' season.  To suggest otherwise is simply trying to flame, but hey that's why you're here right?
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: ronmexico on January 10, 2012, 07:39:04 PM
The final poll results were available at 6 am this morning.  No LSU fan would ask nor want a split title after What happened in the 03' season.  To suggest otherwise is simply trying to flame, but hey that's why you're here right?

You are such a baby.  I made a simple post and as usual, you pitch a fit and act as if you have been attacked.  You guys had a great year, be happy with it.  but as seen last night, the best team won, which validates what many said after the first game, which was bama outplayed lsu, but the score didn't reflect it.

And I guess you missed the interview with miles when he was asked about if they deserved a piece of the title.  He all but begged for it.
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: wiltznucs on January 10, 2012, 07:43:37 PM
Maybe you'd care to link said interview here so the we might all enjoy your discovery.  Or can we just settle now that you are a liar?
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: ronmexico on January 10, 2012, 07:46:59 PM
Maybe you'd care to link said interview here so the we might all enjoy your discovery.  Or can we just settle now that you are a liar?

I'm sure you can google it...

And what did I lie about?
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: wiltznucs on January 10, 2012, 07:48:46 PM
That would imply that such an interview and statements exist, which you and I both know is false.
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: ronmexico on January 10, 2012, 08:02:34 PM
That would imply that such an interview and statements exist, which you and I both know is false.


Look it up.  He was asked about it and proceeded to spout off all that lsu had accomplished and then said it was up to the voters.  Like I said, all but begged for it. 

I don't understand how you can comment on it, when you didn't see the interview.
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: wiltznucs on January 10, 2012, 08:11:40 PM
I'm a TAF member since the mid 1990's.  I have access to every press release, interview, tweet, or otherwise released by LSU and Les Miles.  I know exactly which interview your speaking of and I also know the reason you're avoiding posting it is because you'll look like a fool if you do.  Which is why I'm gonna do it for you.

Coach, you didn't want to address this before about whether or not you might deserve an AP title. You won the division. You won the conference. Do you think there's a case that your team could make as 131 for AP votes, or would you consider Alabama unanimous national champion now?

"Well, the only thing I can tell you is we think we had a great year; that this football team had as quality a run as there is in this country. Played eight nationally ranked teams. Played in six stadiums before the SEC championship game, which we won as well.

"I think this team accomplished a lot. I think that's for the voters to figure."

So we establish two things,.. First, Les Miles at no point issued a single comment regarding the AP prior to the game. Neither LSU or Les Miles lobbied the AP at any point in time.  Secondly, he at no point asked for a single AP vote after the game.  Case closed... Go away...


Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: ronmexico on January 10, 2012, 08:18:51 PM

So we establish two things,.. First, Les Miles at no point issued a single comment regarding the AP prior to the game. Neither LSU or Les Miles lobbied the AP at any point in time.  Secondly, he at no point asked for a single AP vote after the game.  Case closed... Go away...


Who said miles said anything regarding the ap prior to the game?

Secondly, miles reeling off their accomplishments was a veiled attempt at lobbying for a split. 

Lastly, quit bellyaching.
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: wiltznucs on January 10, 2012, 08:22:03 PM
So which was it? Begging or a veiled attempt?  I just want to clarify so that I can better understand you when you start crawfishing again in the future..

How about them Dawgs?  You can always count on ol' Richt to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory can't ya?
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: ronmexico on January 10, 2012, 08:29:18 PM
So which was it? Begging or a veiled attempt?  I just want to clarify so that I can better understand you when you start crawfishing again in the future..

How about them Dawgs?  You can always count on ol' Richt to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory can't ya?

Go back a read it again, I said he all but begged for it.  Reeling off all of lsu's accomplishments was as close to begging for it, without openly saying "we deserve it".

Got it, jr.?
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: wiltznucs on January 10, 2012, 08:36:07 PM
You win Ronnie *lol*

You've made a very compelling argument backed with scant evidence to support your point of view.

The facts completely disagree with you; but nevertheless, I relent as I simply have better things to be doing. 

Until next time.  ROTFLMBO *cheers*
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: ronmexico on January 10, 2012, 08:55:02 PM
You've made a very compelling argument backed with scant evidence to support your point of view.

The facts completely disagree with you; but nevertheless, I relent as I simply have better things to be doing. 

Until next time.  ROTFLMBO *cheers*


The facts disagree with me?  How so?  Just because YOU don't see it that way does not make it fact.

As Dale Sr. said, second place is the first loser.  Couldn't be happier for you, jr.   *aah*
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: ronmexico on January 10, 2012, 09:33:03 PM
The final poll results were available at 6 am this morning.  No LSU fan would ask nor want a split title after What happened in the 03' season.  To suggest otherwise is simply trying to flame, but hey that's why you're here right?

So are you now crawfish'n from this comment?
"Even with a NC loss  LSU Is still the SEC and National Champ."

Does this make you a liar, based on the original quote, or are you just contradicting yourself?

And I guess someone forgot to tell the fact that "lsu is still the national champs", to bama, the bcs and the ap.  *lol*
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: wiltznucs on January 11, 2012, 06:42:28 AM
 *cheers*

 I've enjoyed this segment of "Tall tales with Ronmexico".  You are the preeminent key board tough guy on this site, a master of fiction..

Blake, I don't want to be enemies.  I want you to know that I'm sorry about your dick.  Heck, were all sorry as its pretty clear none of us wants you here.  The mods have been screwing with you for months and yet you still don't get it.  We know you had no control over the situation and the feelings of inadequacy must be what drives you to be a cyber bully. 

None of us takes you seriously.  Youre a comic book character.  You add no value to this site and use it solely for starting arguments.  How sad... It will be a shame when you finally get the ban you so richly deserve.
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: ronmexico on January 11, 2012, 07:32:25 AM
*cheers*

 I've enjoyed this segment of "Tall tales with Ronmexico".  You are the preeminent key board tough guy on this site, a master of fiction..

Blake, I don't want to be enemies.  I want you to know that I'm sorry about your dick.  Heck, were all sorry as its pretty clear none of us wants you here.  The mods have been screwing with you for months and yet you still don't get it.  We know you had no control over the situation and the feelings of inadequacy must be what drives you to be a cyber bully. 

None of us takes you seriously.  Youre a comic book character.  You add no value to this site and use it solely for starting arguments.  How sad... It will be a shame when you finally get the ban you so richly deserve.

ROTFLMBO.  Cyber bully?  Too funny.   Feelings of inadaquency?  I'm not the one trying to measure up with Hinkle. 
 *lol*
You are so predictable and such a cry baby.  I saw you pitching a fit in another thread about the bcs with one of the mimms.  When someone disagrees with you, you say you are being attacked and try to get the mods involved, or try to gain sympathy from others.

And I'm not concerned if you want me on here.  I don't care for you and all your crying. I'm sure your idol Hanoi Jane would be proud of you. If you don't like my comments, don't read them. You said you were done with me, yet you keep coming back, even when a comment isn't directed at you.  I'll send you a box of Kleenex.
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: wiltznucs on January 11, 2012, 07:57:04 AM
Think of the small dick as something that makes you unique.  Like an accessory nipple or an extra vertebrae in the spine which gives you a tail.  Maybe you can do some judicious "manscaping" to make it look bigger?  They say if you lose weight it will appear larger.  I personally can stand to lose 130 lbs, but I'm lazy and divorces are expensive. 

How's that PM inbox doing?  The mods letting you play today?
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: ronmexico on January 11, 2012, 08:04:35 AM
Think of the small dick as something that makes you unique.  Like an accessory nipple or an extra vertebrae in the spine which gives you a tail.  Maybe you can do some judicious "manscaping" to make it look bigger?  They say if you lose weight it will appear larger.  I personally can stand to lose 130 lbs, but I'm lazy and divorces are expensive. 

How's that PM inbox doing?  The mods letting you play today?

Funny, you telling someone they should lose weight.  *aah*

I guess what's more disturbing is that you seem to be infatuated with what I have in my underwear.  Quite creepy more than anything.  Maybe it's baby steps for "coming out". 

What does the cost of a divorce have to do with losing weight?
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: wiltznucs on January 11, 2012, 08:29:42 AM
Not worried about your junk, just looking for the underlying cause of your mental instability and insatiable desire to cause trouble.
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: ronmexico on January 11, 2012, 08:31:58 AM
Not worried about your junk, just looking for the underlying cause of your mental instability and insatiable desire to cause trouble.

You're looking for something alright.

And you talking about my mental instability...that's rich.   *aah*

And you never responded to post #33.  Crawfish'n?
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: wiltznucs on January 11, 2012, 08:43:36 AM
Ronnie, your not dictating the conversation here any longer.  Responding to a question by asking a question isn't an answer and your tactic isnt going to work any longer.  The gig is up, we all know how cut'n'run Ronnie works.  My comments are here for anyone to read.  You alone see fit to question them.  You're transparent as a simple liar and manipulator.  This comes as no surprise as you keep company with other liars and manipulators.  You are the very definition of an internet troll.  Go away...  Theres a village looking for an idiot somewhere I'm sure...
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: ronmexico on January 11, 2012, 08:54:36 AM
Ronnie, your not dictating the conversation here any longer.  Responding to a question by asking a question isn't an answer and your tactic isnt going to work any longer.  The gig is up, we all know how cut'n'run Ronnie works.  My comments are here for anyone to read.  You alone see fit to question them.  You're transparent as a simple liar and manipulator.  This comes as no surprise as you keep company with other liars and manipulators.  You are the very definition of an internet troll.  Go away...  Theres a village looking for an idiot somewhere I'm sure...

What was your question?  You make a bunch of comments about my package (super creepy) and then try and say I'm mentally unstable.  You say you are fat (said you could stand to lose 130 lbs), but reference weight loss in regards to me...once again in reference to my package (still super creepy).  You have a pity party every time someone says something about poor old lsu and you try to make it as if you are being attacked.

Like I said, if you don't like my comments, don't repond.

Give Jenny a call, I'm sure she can hook you up with a weight loss plan.

You keep throwing out the term liar...what did i lie about?

Still waiting for your response to post #33, or are you crawfish'n?
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: wiltznucs on January 11, 2012, 08:57:05 AM
I'm pretty sure that'll about do it... *cheers*

Signing off...
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: ronmexico on January 11, 2012, 01:13:24 PM
The mods have been screwing with you for months and yet you still don't get it.  We know you had no control over the situation

Would this be a fact, or a lie?  Do you have direct knowledge of such, or was this conjured up by the great roost shootin' peacock killa?  Still waiting on your response from post # 33...seníor crawfish.
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: boxcaller on January 13, 2012, 12:36:51 PM
How 'bout them Steelers,....?????????????????????????????



Pat Strawser
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: Scott33 on January 13, 2012, 11:16:05 PM
ROLL TIDE
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: Zumer on January 15, 2012, 02:24:12 PM
How 'bout them Steelers,....?????????????????????????????



Pat Strawser


Yea, how about them Steelers.... *cry*
Title: Re: BAMA
Post by: VGJ5 on January 25, 2012, 06:32:57 PM
Roll Tide Roll!!!